Thursday, July 17, 2014

10 Cities Where Wages Stretch the Farthest

The cost of living can have a big impact on how your income actually stretches. Therefore, adjusting wages for living costs can provide a better glimpse at how much people actually make, suggests a study by Jose Lobo of Arizona State University. Lobo crunched data from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis to find the "real average wage per job," taking into account cost of living and real per-capita personal incomes.
Jobs = Real Estate
"Knowledge hubs and energy centers — those that have both very high wages and generally fair high costs of living, especially along the coasts — dominate the list," The Atlantic CityLab reports. Also, energy metros rose to the top due to a natural gas boom that is rapidly increasing wages in some areas of the country, while cost of living has remained lower than their big-city counterparts, the study notes.
Workers in higher-cost places still tend to do better than most, even when taking into account the higher costs for housing and other expenses, the study suggests. "Their higher wages more than compensate," the article notes. "This takes some of the wind out of the sails of the arguments that people are better off moving from higher-cost to lower-cost places. The underlying factors that improve productivity and increase wages in the first place help workers do better in these high-cost metros."
According to Lobo's study, the following are the metros with the highest real average wages:
  1. San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, Calif.: $75,288
  2. Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, Conn.: $64,321
  3. San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, Calif.: $60,562
  4. California-Lexington Park, Md.: $59,130
  5. Durham-Chapel Hill, N.C.: $58,166
  6. Midland, Texas: $58,153
  7. Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, Texas: $57,461
  8. Midland, Mich.: $57,328
  9. Trenton, N.J.: $55,317
  10. Boston-Cambridge-Newton, Mass.-N.H.: $55,306
Source: “Where Americans Really Earn the Most From Their Paychecks,” The Atlantic CityLab (July 14, 2014)

Wednesday, July 16, 2014

3 Reasons Buyers, Sellers Need You

About 47 percent of home owners say they could sell a home without the help of a real estate agent, and 59 percent say they likely could purchase a home on their own, according to a new survey of 2,500 Americans conducted by BMO Harris Bank. However, three-quarters of respondents also say they ended up using a real estate professional when it came down to it.
This is Why People Need You
“While a notable number of Americans feel they could buy or sell a home without a real estate agent, our survey tells us that when the time came, the majority of home owners did seek the added professional help and enlisted an agent," says Kevin Christopher, head of mortgage sales at BMO Harris Bank. “It can be a complex process.”
What were the top reasons home owners identified for having a real estate agent by their side?

Home Buyers

  • Handling paperwork: 67%
  • Having someone who understands market value: 59%
  • Access to market information: 53%

Home Sellers

  • Handling paperwork: 64%
  • Advertising the home to bring in offers: 58%
  • Having someone to price the home appropriately: 57%
Source: BMO Harris Bank


Tuesday, July 15, 2014

Why Low Rates Aren't Always Good for Housing

Mortgage rates are near historic lows, which is great news for home owners and buyers. But the situation could prove to be a big thorn in the side of the recovery.
More than one-third of homes with a mortgage have a mortgage rate below 4 percent, according to estimates provided by CoreLogic, a real estate data provider. Many home owners have taken advantage of low rates recently, fueling a refinance boom. Some home buyers were able to snag a record low of 3.3 percent interest in 2012.
As such, many home owners may be more inclined to stay put, unwilling to swap out a low mortgage rate for a new mortgage that could carry a rate up to one percentage point higher or more in the coming months. Those who can't stay put may decide to keep their home and rent it out. In any case, the number of homes for-sale could continue to be low and contribute to slower home sales, housing analysts note.
Mark Fleming, chief economist at CoreLogic, estimates that up to 3.6 million home owners will be unlikely to sell this year because they do not want to give up a lower mortgage rate.
"They got the deal of the century," Glenn Kelman, CEO of Redfin, a real estate brokerage, told The Associated Press. "I don't think in 100 years anyone will be lending money at 3.5 percent. How do you walk away from a deal like that?"
Indeed, The Associated Press reports that this marks a significant shift from the way the housing market has worked in the past three decades. “For most of that time, whenever a home owner decided to trade up to a better home, mortgage rates usually were lower than the last time they had bought,” The Associated Press reports. “That helped make a new purchase seem more attractive.”
Economists say “rate lock-in” is a contributing factor for why so few homes are for sale. The housing market has faced a shortage of homes since late 2012. For every $1,000 increase in a home owner’s annual mortgage payment, the likelihood that the home owner would sell dropped as much as 16 percent, according to a 2011 study by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
Source: “Record-Low Mortgage Rates Now Haunt the Housing Market,” The Associated Press (July 11, 2014)



Monday, July 14, 2014

Farmland Boom Shows Signs of Cooling

Following double-digit rates of appreciation, agricultural land prices may soften in the coming months, says Lawrence Yun, National Association of REALTORS®’ chief economist.
What's happening to the boom? Well, Yun says you can blame it on corn prices. They've been on the decline, which means a lower dividend from the land, translating to lower prices for properties.
More on the Farmland Boom:
For example, in Central Illinois the price of corn has been cut in half from $8 per bushel to $4, and could fall even further. In the early 1980s, agricultural land prices fell when the price of corn dramatically dropped and interest rates rose sharply, leaving many farmers unable to generate enough revenue to pay off the interest on the money they owed.
However, Yun notes on NAR’s Economists’ Outlook blog that though corn prices will likely have a negative impact, this time around farmers are at a much more moderate borrowing level than in the past. Also, interest rates remain near historic lows.
“Any decline in land prices will be modest and not like the 1980s,” Yun says. “Most farmers will be able to absorb some decline in land prices without facing financial problems.”
Source: “Agricultural Land Price Trend,” National Association of REALTORS® Economists’ Outlook Blog (July 11, 2014)


The Return of the First-Time Home Buyer?

Young people are starting to leave their parent’s home and move out on their own. The Current Population Survey for 2013 showed a drop in the percentage of 20-somethings living with parents, marking the first decline since 2005.
As of now, the percentage drop appears minimal: Those aged 18 to 24 living with parents or a related subgroup dropped from 56 percent to 55 percent in one year. However, Brad Hunter, chief economist at Metrostudy, notes in a Builder online article that the one-percentage-point decline represents 300,000 people who are now looking for a household of their own that who were previously living with their parents.
More on first-time buyers:
Indeed, a recent report by Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies predicts that 2.7 million more households will form among people in their 30s over the next decade.
First-time buyers usually make up about 40 percent of home buyers. However, lately, the share has been in the 35 percent to 38 percent range, Hunter says. For existing-home sales, first-time buyers’ share is less than one-third of all buyers, at 27 percent in May, according to the National Association of REALTORS®.
The delay in millennials branching out on their own has greatly reduced household formation in recent years. Household formation rates usually average 1.4 million per year. Lately, the rate has been a fraction of that, about 500,000 to 700,000 a year.
“We are seeing some evidence that young people who had moved in with their parents or relatives are now finding the means and the motivation to move out and get their own place,” Hunter notes. “While most of these newly-emerging twenty-somethings will be going into rentals, the movement out of the parental home is nonetheless expected to support a series of positive steps from rentals to entry-level re-sales to entry-level new homes, and on up the ladder.”


Friday, July 11, 2014

Report: Hurricanes Could Put 6.5 Million U.S. Homes at Risk

More than 6.5 million homes along the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf coasts could be at risk of a storm surge from a hurricane, which could amount to nearly $1.5 trillion in potential reconstruction costs, according to the 2014 storm surge analysis conducted by CoreLogic. The analysis estimates the number and reconstruction value of single-family homes that could be exposed to a potential hurricane-driven storm surge.
When natural disaster strikes:
“This exposure could constitute significant risk for home owners and financial services companies, as many at-risk homes lack protection from insurance coverage,” CoreLogic’s report notes.
Florida has the highest number of homes at risk of storm surge damage, with nearly 2.5 million homes potentially in harms way, representing $490 billion in potential damages, according to the report. At the metro level, the New York metro area, which includes northern New Jersey and Long Island, contained the highest number of homes at risk for potential storm surge damage – 687,412 – as well as the highest reconstruction value at more than $251 billion.
The reconstruction value of homes exposed to storm surge damage was found to be much greater in the Atlantic region than the Gulf. The total reconstruction cost value of homes along the Atlantic coast is nearly $951 billion – nearly double the value of properties at-risk in the Gulf Region, at slightly over $545 billion, according to the report.
The CoreLogic analysis includes single-family homes, mobile homes, duplexes, manufactured homes and cabins. View the full report at CoreLogic. 
Source: CoreLogic




pendinghomesales Arizona AZ MesaAZ MesaArizona mesaarizonahomes mesaarizonahomesforsale mesaarizonarealestate gilbertaz gilbertazhomesforsale mesaazrealestate mesaazhomesforsale gilbertaz gilbertazrealestate gilbertazhomes gilbertazrealestateagent mesaazrealestateagent queencreekaz santanvalleyrealestate santanvalley santanvalleyrealtor santanvalleyaz santanvalleyhomesforsale queencreekrealestate queencreekaz queencreekrealtor florenceaz chandleraz chandlerazrealestate chandlerazhomesforsale chandlerazocotillorealestate scottsdalerealestate scottsdaleaz scottsdalehomesforsale scottsdalerealtors paradisevalley paradisevalleyaz paradisevalleyrealestate phoenixaz arizonarealestate Azrealestate arizonastate azrealestate azrealestateforsale azrealestateagent remax remaxagent buyingahome selligahome apachejunctionproperties apachejunctionhomesforsale apachejunctionarizona apachejunctionhomesales tempeaz tempeazhomesforsale tempeazhomes goldcanyonrealestate goldcanyonaz 

The 10 Priciest Places to Live in the World

In Hong Kong, you might pay $6.64 in U.S. dollars for a cup of coffee, or $6,960 to rent an unfurnished, two-bedroom apartment. Hong Kong landed No. 3 on Mercer’s latest annual Cost of Living Survey. The survey is geared to give those who are working abroad insight into the cost of living and is often used by employers to develop compensation packages for people with international assignments.
To arrive at its list, Mercer researchers analyzed cities in five continents, measuring the comparative cost of more than 200 items in each location, such as housing, food, clothing, transportation, household goods, and entertainment. They used New York as a baseline city to compare against the other cities.
“Despite moderate price increases in most of the European cities, European currencies for the most part slightly strengthened against the U.S. dollar, which pushed most Western European cities up in the ranking,” Nathalie Constantin-Métral, who compiled the survey, told Forbes. A rise in the cost of rentals has also pushed some European cities up in the rankings, particularly Copenhagen, Amsterdam, and Frankfurt, according to the study.
The following are the most expensive cities in the world in 2014, according to Mercer’s survey:
Exchange rates are benefiting foreign buyers:
1.     Luanda, Angola
2.     N’Djamena, Chad
3.     Hong Kong, Hong Kong
4.     Singapore, Singapore
5.     Zurich, Switzerland
6.     Geneva, Switzerland
7.     Tokyo, Japan
8.     Bern, Switzerland
9.     Moscow, Russia
10.   Shanghai, China
Source: “The Most Expensive Cities in the World,” Forbes.com (July 10, 2014)






pendinghomesales Arizona AZ MesaAZ MesaArizona mesaarizonahomes mesaarizonahomesforsale mesaarizonarealestate gilbertaz gilbertazhomesforsale mesaazrealestate mesaazhomesforsale gilbertaz gilbertazrealestate gilbertazhomes gilbertazrealestateagent mesaazrealestateagent queencreekaz santanvalleyrealestate santanvalley santanvalleyrealtor santanvalleyaz santanvalleyhomesforsale queencreekrealestate queencreekaz queencreekrealtor florenceaz chandleraz chandlerazrealestate chandlerazhomesforsale chandlerazocotillorealestate scottsdalerealestate scottsdaleaz scottsdalehomesforsale scottsdalerealtors paradisevalley paradisevalleyaz paradisevalleyrealestate phoenixaz arizonarealestate Azrealestate arizonastate azrealestate azrealestateforsale azrealestateagent remax remaxagent buyingahome selligahome apachejunctionproperties apachejunctionhomesforsale apachejunctionarizona apachejunctionhomesales tempeaz tempeazhomesforsale tempeazhomes goldcanyonrealestate goldcanyonaz